What are two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory?
Q. What are two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory. Which scientists were involved with these models? Which experiments were used to make these discoveries, and what conclusions were drawn? Its for a my chem review and i cant find the answer no where...Pleas Help
Asked by Short Court - Fri Apr 4 18:52:48 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. JJ Thompson's Plum Pudding; Rutherford's Gold Foil Experiment; John Dalton's Theory on Atoms; Meitner's Discovery of Fission; Neils Bohr (Quantum Mechanics & the Hydrogen Atom); the list goes on... We owe these geniuses so much for what they have done
Answered by Matthew S - Fri Apr 4 19:03:37 2008
Q. What are two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory. Which scientists were involved with these models? Which experiments were used to make these discoveries, and what conclusions were drawn? Its for a my chem review and i cant find the answer no where...Pleas Help
Asked by Short Court - Fri Apr 4 18:52:48 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. JJ Thompson's Plum Pudding; Rutherford's Gold Foil Experiment; John Dalton's Theory on Atoms; Meitner's Discovery of Fission; Neils Bohr (Quantum Mechanics & the Hydrogen Atom); the list goes on... We owe these geniuses so much for what they have done
Answered by Matthew S - Fri Apr 4 19:03:37 2008
What is the general relationship among frames of reference, models, theory, and hypothesis?
Q. What is the general relationship among frames of reference, models, theory, and hypothesis?
Asked by Stephanie A - Sun Jan 27 04:35:33 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. these are processes relative to conducting a systematic and/or a scientific study. it begins with a problem, u write the statement of the problem which answer questions that have the most significance in addressing the problem, use methods of research as reference materials, models,and theories from which, the significance thereby supports or disproves the hypothesis. ex.: if ur subject is about proving that a computerized inventory system is more effective than the manual system, then ur hypothesis should say that there is significant difference between the two. and by conducting the study, u should be able to prove that it does. if u say otherwise, then likewise, u should be able to prove that it doesn't. there r still other parts to a… [cont.]
Answered by InherentlySickeninglySweet - Sun Jan 27 05:13:12 2008
Q. What is the general relationship among frames of reference, models, theory, and hypothesis?
Asked by Stephanie A - Sun Jan 27 04:35:33 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. these are processes relative to conducting a systematic and/or a scientific study. it begins with a problem, u write the statement of the problem which answer questions that have the most significance in addressing the problem, use methods of research as reference materials, models,and theories from which, the significance thereby supports or disproves the hypothesis. ex.: if ur subject is about proving that a computerized inventory system is more effective than the manual system, then ur hypothesis should say that there is significant difference between the two. and by conducting the study, u should be able to prove that it does. if u say otherwise, then likewise, u should be able to prove that it doesn't. there r still other parts to a… [cont.]
Answered by InherentlySickeninglySweet - Sun Jan 27 05:13:12 2008
Why CAPM and index models are believed to provide more accurate data than Markovitz portfolio theory?
Q. It is said that CAPM and index models provide more accurate data than Markoviz portfolio theory which is based on past return (past returns are believed to be unreliable guides to expected future returns). How come do index models provide more accurate data if they are based on beta and beta is the change in the stock return per unit change in the market return (which is calculated using historical data as well)?
Asked by Ponchik - Sun Dec 6 22:03:43 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Very good question! The weakness of the Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) is that it is heavily based on past data, using standard deviation to measure variability or risk. But this is only valid when returns follow a normal distribution, and is therefore very poor in predicting extreme outcomes, making it less realistic. Standard MPT models put a very low probability on market slides, 1 slide every 200 years. Slides seem to happen every few years, causing the theory to understate risk and leading investors to load up on risky assets like equities (further increasing market risk). The CAPM on the other hand, is based less on historical data but still uses beta which is derived from past performance. A famous 1992 study published in the… [cont.]
Answered by Matt - Sun Dec 6 23:03:29 2009
Q. It is said that CAPM and index models provide more accurate data than Markoviz portfolio theory which is based on past return (past returns are believed to be unreliable guides to expected future returns). How come do index models provide more accurate data if they are based on beta and beta is the change in the stock return per unit change in the market return (which is calculated using historical data as well)?
Asked by Ponchik - Sun Dec 6 22:03:43 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Very good question! The weakness of the Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) is that it is heavily based on past data, using standard deviation to measure variability or risk. But this is only valid when returns follow a normal distribution, and is therefore very poor in predicting extreme outcomes, making it less realistic. Standard MPT models put a very low probability on market slides, 1 slide every 200 years. Slides seem to happen every few years, causing the theory to understate risk and leading investors to load up on risky assets like equities (further increasing market risk). The CAPM on the other hand, is based less on historical data but still uses beta which is derived from past performance. A famous 1992 study published in the… [cont.]
Answered by Matt - Sun Dec 6 23:03:29 2009
What were two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory?
Q. What were two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory???
Asked by dreamer5577 - Mon Dec 14 10:37:08 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Saturn model by H Nagoaka, describing atoms with rings of electrons like the rings of planet Saturn. And Rutherford's nuclear atom, mostly space in which electrons traveled like planets around the sun.
Answered by Fred - Mon Dec 14 10:50:15 2009
Q. What were two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory???
Asked by dreamer5577 - Mon Dec 14 10:37:08 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Saturn model by H Nagoaka, describing atoms with rings of electrons like the rings of planet Saturn. And Rutherford's nuclear atom, mostly space in which electrons traveled like planets around the sun.
Answered by Fred - Mon Dec 14 10:50:15 2009
How to get shear force using the "Truss Model Theory" from Hsu and Mo?
Q. I'm doing a research on the prediction of the behavior of shear wall. I need to use the Truss Model Theory from Hsu and Mo journal titled "Softening of Concrete in Low-Rise Shearwall". I have problems understanding the equation and substituting the values into the equations. I hope anyone out there can help me with a relevant example. Thanks!
Asked by kwsim_80 - Mon Apr 3 22:00:56 2006 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hi contact me at blade_trinity_mr@yahoo.co m and if you can send me the papers you have for this subject and i'll try to help you.
Answered by makarim83 - Tue Apr 4 16:47:48 2006
Q. I'm doing a research on the prediction of the behavior of shear wall. I need to use the Truss Model Theory from Hsu and Mo journal titled "Softening of Concrete in Low-Rise Shearwall". I have problems understanding the equation and substituting the values into the equations. I hope anyone out there can help me with a relevant example. Thanks!
Asked by kwsim_80 - Mon Apr 3 22:00:56 2006 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hi contact me at blade_trinity_mr@yahoo.co m and if you can send me the papers you have for this subject and i'll try to help you.
Answered by makarim83 - Tue Apr 4 16:47:48 2006
What is the relationship between models and theories?
Q. What is the relationship between models and theories? Please explain im so lost.
Asked by scottifan10 - Tue Sep 8 22:51:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. In most cases they tend to be indistinguishable. However technically a model doesn't have to specify the reasoning behind the situation it is modelling, it can be just a simplification of what is happening. A theory generally explains the "why?" of a model. For example, Bohr has a "model" of the atom because he just states that electrons have discrete energy levels but doesn't explain why. Quantum mechanics provides a theory of the electrons within the atom, because it explains their discrete energy levels.
Answered by iqof300 - Tue Sep 8 23:11:32 2009
Q. What is the relationship between models and theories? Please explain im so lost.
Asked by scottifan10 - Tue Sep 8 22:51:14 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. In most cases they tend to be indistinguishable. However technically a model doesn't have to specify the reasoning behind the situation it is modelling, it can be just a simplification of what is happening. A theory generally explains the "why?" of a model. For example, Bohr has a "model" of the atom because he just states that electrons have discrete energy levels but doesn't explain why. Quantum mechanics provides a theory of the electrons within the atom, because it explains their discrete energy levels.
Answered by iqof300 - Tue Sep 8 23:11:32 2009
Health Beliefs Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour- could someone please explain the difference to me?
Q. Also, does anybody know anything about Weiner's attributional model? I am looking at involving these models in my honours dissertation but i can't really work out the finer details that distinguish them. -- Ta.
Asked by miss.muffett - Thu Feb 21 07:56:14 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They're both theories of health behaviour...that's the main similarity. Basically the health belief model suggests that people will engage in health behaviours based on four factors: perceived susceptibility (to a health threat), perceived severity (of the health threat), benefits and barriers (of getting rid of the health threat), and cues to action. Then if you include an individual's 'self-efficacy' to those four factors, you get the Protection Motivation Theory of Health. On the other hand there is the Theory of Reasoned Action which is based on one's 'attitudes' and 'subjective norms'. Add 'self-efficacy' to this theory and voila you have the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Sorry I don't know about that Weiner's Attributional Model yet. [cont.]
Answered by daph_0444 - Thu Feb 21 08:42:28 2008
Q. Also, does anybody know anything about Weiner's attributional model? I am looking at involving these models in my honours dissertation but i can't really work out the finer details that distinguish them. -- Ta.
Asked by miss.muffett - Thu Feb 21 07:56:14 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They're both theories of health behaviour...that's the main similarity. Basically the health belief model suggests that people will engage in health behaviours based on four factors: perceived susceptibility (to a health threat), perceived severity (of the health threat), benefits and barriers (of getting rid of the health threat), and cues to action. Then if you include an individual's 'self-efficacy' to those four factors, you get the Protection Motivation Theory of Health. On the other hand there is the Theory of Reasoned Action which is based on one's 'attitudes' and 'subjective norms'. Add 'self-efficacy' to this theory and voila you have the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Sorry I don't know about that Weiner's Attributional Model yet. [cont.]
Answered by daph_0444 - Thu Feb 21 08:42:28 2008
what is the difference between a leadership model and leadership theory?
Q. which comes first, the model or the theory?
Asked by i_squeeze - Thu Jul 10 02:35:28 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Theory gives you the instructions how to be a good leader but model gives you an example of it and you are able to see actually how good leader looks like.
Answered by samra civoremo - Thu Jul 10 05:31:07 2008
Q. which comes first, the model or the theory?
Asked by i_squeeze - Thu Jul 10 02:35:28 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Theory gives you the instructions how to be a good leader but model gives you an example of it and you are able to see actually how good leader looks like.
Answered by samra civoremo - Thu Jul 10 05:31:07 2008
If i was to use a model of string theory as a map, where would we be as opposed to the furthest visible point?
Q. If we were located in the middle of a model of string theory, would the furthestmost point also be located in the middle, or would it still be located towards the outer edge? If its the latter, does that mean that only certain laws of physics would apply to it?
Asked by s - Wed Jul 29 15:37:41 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I think you are referring to the cosmic landscape for String Theory, and the points has to do with vacuum energies as well as universal constants, thus leading to different physical laws. If that is the correct interpretation of your question, then NO the middle of the landscape would not be also located at the furtherest points. Each point represent a unique set of vacuum energy and physical laws.
Answered by PhysicsDude - Fri Jul 31 01:32:59 2009
Q. If we were located in the middle of a model of string theory, would the furthestmost point also be located in the middle, or would it still be located towards the outer edge? If its the latter, does that mean that only certain laws of physics would apply to it?
Asked by s - Wed Jul 29 15:37:41 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I think you are referring to the cosmic landscape for String Theory, and the points has to do with vacuum energies as well as universal constants, thus leading to different physical laws. If that is the correct interpretation of your question, then NO the middle of the landscape would not be also located at the furtherest points. Each point represent a unique set of vacuum energy and physical laws.
Answered by PhysicsDude - Fri Jul 31 01:32:59 2009
scientists in the 20th century who contributed to today's atomic theory and model?
Q. i have to write a rough draft about it besides rutherford, planck, and bohr.
Asked by idkmybffkandy - Tue Nov 25 04:09:55 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. i have to write a rough draft about it besides rutherford, planck, and bohr.
Asked by idkmybffkandy - Tue Nov 25 04:09:55 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
what are two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory?
Q. what are two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory?
Asked by 3m!ly.. - Mon Aug 18 20:58:56 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Niels Bohr's Planetary model and the Plum Pudding model (think this was Thompson's creation but it validated by Rutherford). Both Bohr's planetary model and Thompson's Plum pudding model have been replaced by the modern quantum mechanical model. Click the links below to learn more about both of these early atomic models.
Answered by Johnny D - Mon Aug 18 21:07:44 2008
Q. what are two of the early atomic models that contributed to the formulation of the modern atomic theory?
Asked by 3m!ly.. - Mon Aug 18 20:58:56 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Niels Bohr's Planetary model and the Plum Pudding model (think this was Thompson's creation but it validated by Rutherford). Both Bohr's planetary model and Thompson's Plum pudding model have been replaced by the modern quantum mechanical model. Click the links below to learn more about both of these early atomic models.
Answered by Johnny D - Mon Aug 18 21:07:44 2008
How does the mathematically modelling in Super String theory, actually describe what matter really is?
Q. It seems like we end up with many different mathematical models that seem to fit some parts of how we think the system works, without us getting any nearer to the true nature of matter. Tried reading articles on string theory, really hoped someone might have a novel/imaginative way of explaining how to picture other dimensions. It's usually at that stage my brain develops a need for either food/drink or painkillers. I just feel that the complicated theories are so removed from our normal reality, that it's virtually impossible to experimentally verify them. If the theories infered some new interaction which we could could devise a test for, it would all seem more believable.
Asked by David R - Mon Jul 24 13:02:50 2006 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There is some thinking that it doesn't help much. In fact, some scientists are beginning to think that Super String Theory is a failure and point out that we really don't know any more about the nature of matter than we did several decades ago.
Answered by Spot! - Mon Jul 24 20:39:33 2006
Q. It seems like we end up with many different mathematical models that seem to fit some parts of how we think the system works, without us getting any nearer to the true nature of matter. Tried reading articles on string theory, really hoped someone might have a novel/imaginative way of explaining how to picture other dimensions. It's usually at that stage my brain develops a need for either food/drink or painkillers. I just feel that the complicated theories are so removed from our normal reality, that it's virtually impossible to experimentally verify them. If the theories infered some new interaction which we could could devise a test for, it would all seem more believable.
Asked by David R - Mon Jul 24 13:02:50 2006 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There is some thinking that it doesn't help much. In fact, some scientists are beginning to think that Super String Theory is a failure and point out that we really don't know any more about the nature of matter than we did several decades ago.
Answered by Spot! - Mon Jul 24 20:39:33 2006
define political theory and what are models?
Q. define political theory and what are models?
Asked by Jess - Wed Feb 3 19:14:22 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. political theory is a theory about politics.
Answered by FOX News is the best - Sun Feb 7 14:16:36 2010
Q. define political theory and what are models?
Asked by Jess - Wed Feb 3 19:14:22 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. political theory is a theory about politics.
Answered by FOX News is the best - Sun Feb 7 14:16:36 2010
how to build a model that explain about the theory in linear motion?
Q. i'm working on my physic project.we are asked by our lecturer to build a model that related to topic linear motion.we need to explain the theory or application of formula in the topic by using the model that we had proposed.we need to create a simple model.but i can't found any website that suitable for my project.is there anyone know if there any website that i can refer to find the solution?
Asked by siti0012 - Sat Mar 3 10:24:04 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Drop a ball from a distance h - that's linear motion. The time, t it takes for the ball to reach the ground is defined by root of h/g. The terminal velocity is h/t.
Answered by DuckyWucky - Sat Mar 3 11:06:39 2007
Q. i'm working on my physic project.we are asked by our lecturer to build a model that related to topic linear motion.we need to explain the theory or application of formula in the topic by using the model that we had proposed.we need to create a simple model.but i can't found any website that suitable for my project.is there anyone know if there any website that i can refer to find the solution?
Asked by siti0012 - Sat Mar 3 10:24:04 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Drop a ball from a distance h - that's linear motion. The time, t it takes for the ball to reach the ground is defined by root of h/g. The terminal velocity is h/t.
Answered by DuckyWucky - Sat Mar 3 11:06:39 2007
Are there any theories or models attempting to explain why mankind seems to be?
Q. living at odds with nature while every other living thing exists in a way that ensures the earths survival?
Asked by Guardian - Sun Oct 21 18:55:35 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Humans tend to be careless, lazy, reckless and greedy. Thus, some of us toss a bottle into the ocean. Others save money by releasing factory waste into a river. Sometimes, presidents favoring large Corporations allow lumbering and oil rigs in National Parks and public lands. Some people care about the environment. Others sneer and call environmentalists "treehuggers" or worse. When it is all gone and the once green and glorious planet is dark and useless, some of us will cry over our own stupidity and others will shrug and say it is God's will...because, if they can't blame it on Bill Clinton, they blame it on God!
Answered by Me, Too - Sun Oct 21 19:29:12 2007
Q. living at odds with nature while every other living thing exists in a way that ensures the earths survival?
Asked by Guardian - Sun Oct 21 18:55:35 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Humans tend to be careless, lazy, reckless and greedy. Thus, some of us toss a bottle into the ocean. Others save money by releasing factory waste into a river. Sometimes, presidents favoring large Corporations allow lumbering and oil rigs in National Parks and public lands. Some people care about the environment. Others sneer and call environmentalists "treehuggers" or worse. When it is all gone and the once green and glorious planet is dark and useless, some of us will cry over our own stupidity and others will shrug and say it is God's will...because, if they can't blame it on Bill Clinton, they blame it on God!
Answered by Me, Too - Sun Oct 21 19:29:12 2007
compare and contrast a model and theory?
Q. compare and contrast a model and theory? give me both sides. also, what things do they have in common?
Asked by Waverly - Mon Sep 28 21:05:27 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This came from: *** mod el / m dl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [mod-l] Show IPA noun, adjective, verb, -eled, -el ing or (especially British) -elled, -el ling. Use model in a Sentence See web results for model See images of model noun 1. a standard or example for imitation or comparison. 2. a representation, generally in miniature, to show the construction or appearance of something. 3. an image in clay, wax, or the like, to be reproduced in more durable material. 4. a person or thing that serves as a subject for an artist, sculptor, writer, etc. 5. a person whose profession is posing for artists or photographers. 6. a person employed to wear clothing or pose with a product for purposes of display and advertising. 7. a style or… [cont.]
Answered by B. - Tue Sep 29 11:40:25 2009
Q. compare and contrast a model and theory? give me both sides. also, what things do they have in common?
Asked by Waverly - Mon Sep 28 21:05:27 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This came from: *** mod el / m dl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [mod-l] Show IPA noun, adjective, verb, -eled, -el ing or (especially British) -elled, -el ling. Use model in a Sentence See web results for model See images of model noun 1. a standard or example for imitation or comparison. 2. a representation, generally in miniature, to show the construction or appearance of something. 3. an image in clay, wax, or the like, to be reproduced in more durable material. 4. a person or thing that serves as a subject for an artist, sculptor, writer, etc. 5. a person whose profession is posing for artists or photographers. 6. a person employed to wear clothing or pose with a product for purposes of display and advertising. 7. a style or… [cont.]
Answered by B. - Tue Sep 29 11:40:25 2009
What are the processes used to test and validate models and theories in Chemistry?
Q. What are the processes used to test and validate models and theories in Chemistry?
Asked by Morganita - Sun Mar 23 22:52:28 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The scientific method and specifically testing in a controlled environment: Here is a simplified scheme (1) Design an experiment (2) Calculate the expected results (3) Work in a controlled environment -- remove external influences -- use calibrated instruments -- instruments are clean and free of contaminants -- etc (4) Perform the experiment and record measures (type of molecules produced, temperature, concentration, ...) (5) Compare measures with expected results (6) The best test is when the experiments are performed by many laboratories in the world. this link summarizes the method:
Answered by Zeta1 - Sun Mar 23 23:34:29 2008
Q. What are the processes used to test and validate models and theories in Chemistry?
Asked by Morganita - Sun Mar 23 22:52:28 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The scientific method and specifically testing in a controlled environment: Here is a simplified scheme (1) Design an experiment (2) Calculate the expected results (3) Work in a controlled environment -- remove external influences -- use calibrated instruments -- instruments are clean and free of contaminants -- etc (4) Perform the experiment and record measures (type of molecules produced, temperature, concentration, ...) (5) Compare measures with expected results (6) The best test is when the experiments are performed by many laboratories in the world. this link summarizes the method:
Answered by Zeta1 - Sun Mar 23 23:34:29 2008
what are the advantages and disadvantages of kinked demand theory model?
Q. what are the advantages and disadvantages of kinked demand theory model?
Asked by Rosyanne - Mon Nov 6 18:35:33 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Kinked demand theory is fantastic when you are analysing a problem involving a good for which demand is 'kinked'. If you are thinking about most goods, then demand is not kinked, and the theory is useless. Your question is like asking 'what are the advantages and disadvantages of a car'. If you want to get from one place to another and they are a reasonable distance apart, thena car if just what you need. If you are trying to get the lid off a bottle of softdrink, then a car doesn't really help - what you need is a bottle opener.
Answered by eco101 - Mon Nov 6 19:12:47 2006
Q. what are the advantages and disadvantages of kinked demand theory model?
Asked by Rosyanne - Mon Nov 6 18:35:33 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Kinked demand theory is fantastic when you are analysing a problem involving a good for which demand is 'kinked'. If you are thinking about most goods, then demand is not kinked, and the theory is useless. Your question is like asking 'what are the advantages and disadvantages of a car'. If you want to get from one place to another and they are a reasonable distance apart, thena car if just what you need. If you are trying to get the lid off a bottle of softdrink, then a car doesn't really help - what you need is a bottle opener.
Answered by eco101 - Mon Nov 6 19:12:47 2006
Why r both the photon & electromagnetic wave models accepted as a single theory & y was it hard to accept?
Q. Why r both the photon & electromagnetic wave models accepted as a single theory & y was it hard to accept?
Asked by JUDY T - Mon Feb 5 23:19:33 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It is because of something called wave-particle duality of light. It basically says that light can exist as either a particle or a wave, and has properties of both, but not at the same time. And so, light is a particle, the photon, as well as a wave, the electromagnetic wave. This is so hard to accept because it completely goes against all our intuition and our classical definitions of particles nad waves, but then again, that is what quantum mechanics does. It doesn't make any sense at all, with what quantum entanglement or the double-slit experiment, but when it comes down to the actual mathematical equations and phenomena it starts to make sense.
Answered by kz - Mon Feb 5 23:24:26 2007
Q. Why r both the photon & electromagnetic wave models accepted as a single theory & y was it hard to accept?
Asked by JUDY T - Mon Feb 5 23:19:33 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It is because of something called wave-particle duality of light. It basically says that light can exist as either a particle or a wave, and has properties of both, but not at the same time. And so, light is a particle, the photon, as well as a wave, the electromagnetic wave. This is so hard to accept because it completely goes against all our intuition and our classical definitions of particles nad waves, but then again, that is what quantum mechanics does. It doesn't make any sense at all, with what quantum entanglement or the double-slit experiment, but when it comes down to the actual mathematical equations and phenomena it starts to make sense.
Answered by kz - Mon Feb 5 23:24:26 2007
molecular orbital theory is based upon which of the following models of the atom?
Q. a. democritus`s model b. bohr model c. quantum mechanical model d. classical mechanical model
Asked by Carlos B - Mon Dec 7 22:02:38 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. a. democritus`s model b. bohr model c. quantum mechanical model d. classical mechanical model
Asked by Carlos B - Mon Dec 7 22:02:38 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'theory models'
Sun Mar 7 18:57:46 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
uddebatt.wordpress.com
sophiaalbertina
Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:51:02 GM
aeven mina inlaegg: Observation does not fit . theory. and yet the . theory. is deemed correct, Tropical Water Vapor and Cloud Feedbacks in Climate . Models. , The Spatial Pattern and [...] ...
[Hide]▲
