I need the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit/James N Clayton vs Michael Corsini?
Q. The decision was rendered 12/29/1995, no. 06-1381
Asked by Maggie - Wed Jan 24 14:54:20 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. why? are you a law student? have you tried findlaw.com?
Answered by Jack C - Wed Jan 24 14:57:17 2007
Q. The decision was rendered 12/29/1995, no. 06-1381
Asked by Maggie - Wed Jan 24 14:54:20 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. why? are you a law student? have you tried findlaw.com?
Answered by Jack C - Wed Jan 24 14:57:17 2007
Where is Ma. Corsini Aragon Macatumpag?
Q. My wife abandoned me more than 18 years ago, but i'm still hoping to see her again and reunited with her.
Asked by Raul R - Thu Sep 14 14:13:38 2006 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Try searching on www.zabasearch.com
Answered by sierramami - Thu Sep 14 19:45:00 2006
Q. My wife abandoned me more than 18 years ago, but i'm still hoping to see her again and reunited with her.
Asked by Raul R - Thu Sep 14 14:13:38 2006 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Try searching on www.zabasearch.com
Answered by sierramami - Thu Sep 14 19:45:00 2006
Is the following dramatic theory correct?
Q. New dramatic theory model: C = T + dmt(x) This replaces the Shakesperean model that goes like this C=Weddings T=Death Where C = comedy and T = tragedy and d = distance and m=mood and t =time and x = number of objects in your mouth and or esophagus R=Ruch Factor (Although objects in mouth are comedic, objects in esophagus are tragic) Here is the fully developed thereom and its two corollaries and one coronary. Corsini Correlative C = T + dmt(x) 1st Corollary of the Corsini Correlative dmt(x) - R = C 2nd Coronary of the Corsini Correlative Rx +dmt(x)= T 3rd Corollary of the Corsini Correlative dmt=silent swearing Silent swearing is not inherently funny. But when one applies the Heisenberg Uncertainty theory, it is funny.… [cont.]
Asked by Pluto Corsini - Fri Mar 2 16:30:08 2007 - - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Goodness gracious. I don't believe I've ever seen the comic formula in actual formula form ever before! However, I think you may be missing a couple of variables: -b (bodily functions--I work with junior high kids and this one's key to their brand of humor) -s (3 stooges~i.e. physical gags: banana peels, whoopee cushions, pratfalls, etc.) -p (parody: making fun of other texts; see also: Scary Movies #1-984) -j (Jim Carrey: contorting your face into all sorts of odd, plastic expressions, possibly to the exclusion of actual acting) -
Answered by waldy - Fri Mar 2 19:07:19 2007
Q. New dramatic theory model: C = T + dmt(x) This replaces the Shakesperean model that goes like this C=Weddings T=Death Where C = comedy and T = tragedy and d = distance and m=mood and t =time and x = number of objects in your mouth and or esophagus R=Ruch Factor (Although objects in mouth are comedic, objects in esophagus are tragic) Here is the fully developed thereom and its two corollaries and one coronary. Corsini Correlative C = T + dmt(x) 1st Corollary of the Corsini Correlative dmt(x) - R = C 2nd Coronary of the Corsini Correlative Rx +dmt(x)= T 3rd Corollary of the Corsini Correlative dmt=silent swearing Silent swearing is not inherently funny. But when one applies the Heisenberg Uncertainty theory, it is funny.… [cont.]
Asked by Pluto Corsini - Fri Mar 2 16:30:08 2007 - - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Goodness gracious. I don't believe I've ever seen the comic formula in actual formula form ever before! However, I think you may be missing a couple of variables: -b (bodily functions--I work with junior high kids and this one's key to their brand of humor) -s (3 stooges~i.e. physical gags: banana peels, whoopee cushions, pratfalls, etc.) -p (parody: making fun of other texts; see also: Scary Movies #1-984) -j (Jim Carrey: contorting your face into all sorts of odd, plastic expressions, possibly to the exclusion of actual acting) -
Answered by waldy - Fri Mar 2 19:07:19 2007
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'corsini'
Mon Nov 2 17:44:50 2009 [ refresh local cache ]
